Delhi High Court Handwriting Comparison: Courts Must Follow Fair Procedure
The Delhi High Court handwriting comparison ruling emphasizes that courts must follow fair procedure and natural justice before comparing handwriting samples, reinforcing transparency in evidentiary processes.
Delhi High Court Written Statement Rule: Larger Bench to Decide Key Procedural Issue
Delhi High Court refers a key issue on whether written statements filed without affidavit within 120 days are invalid or curable defects.
Karnataka High Court Expands Motor Accident Compensation Law: Institutions Can Claim Dependency Loss
Karnataka High Court motor accident compensation ruling expands dependency law, allowing institutions, not just families, to claim compensation for loss of dependency.
Kerala High Court Advocate Fees: No Right to Stall Execution Proceedings
Kerala High Court holds advocates cannot stall execution proceedings for fee recovery and must use proper legal remedies for disputes.
Supreme Court Maintenance Order: ₹10,000 Monthly Awarded to Estranged Wife
Supreme Court orders ₹10,000 monthly maintenance to wife, rejecting husband’s claim of earning ₹325 per day due to lack of credibility.
293 Supreme Court Lawyers Apply for Senior Advocate Designation – Process Explained
The Supreme Court of India has received 293 applications from advocates seeking Senior Advocate designation following notices issued in February 2026. The Court has invited suggestions from members of the Bar and stakeholders, which will be considered by the Full Court under the Guidelines for Designation of Senior Advocates, 2026.
High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Clarified by Supreme Court
The Supreme Court Collegium has introduced a new policy allowing judges set to become Chief Justices of High Courts to be transferred in advance of upcoming vacancies. The move aims to ensure smoother leadership transitions, administrative continuity, and uninterrupted judicial functioning.
Court Fee Not Meant to Be a Penalty on Litigants: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court held that court fees are not meant to operate as a penalty on litigants and should not deter access to justice. Granting relief to RI Networks Pvt. Ltd., the Court ordered a refund of ₹8.7 lakh in court fees after its suit was rejected at the threshold without adjudication on merits and the litigant was relegated to the appropriate forum, TDSAT.
Non-Citizens Cannot Be Terminated Solely on Grounds of Nationality: Madras High Court Grants Relief to Sri Lankan Refugee
The Madras High Court ruled that non-citizens, including registered Sri Lankan Tamil refugees, are entitled to protection under Article 14 against arbitrary State action. Quashing SBI’s termination of a refugee employee, the Court held that nationality alone cannot justify removal from service when the appointment was lawful and non-fraudulent.